A couple of months ago, my mom and I were shopping in downtown Seattle when she suddenly stopped me across the street from an American Apparel store, put on her serious face and said, “Meg, promise me right now that you will never, EVER, buy anything from that store, American Apparel.” I thought she was crazy. When I asked why, she told me about how their CEO was a “dirtbag” who sexually harassed his employees and responded to their legal actions with a general tone of, “I own this company, I can run it anyway I want.”

The first time I walked into an American Apparel store a few years ago (it was the one on West Burnside in Portland), I thought I’d died and gone to heaven. I wear almost exclusively solid-colored clothing, and that’s all they sell. It seems stupid, but it’s incredibly difficult to find plain clothing that doesn’t have some sort of logo or brand name on it. The store was a huge white room with every style of shirt, sweatshirt, and sweatpant that a person could want, and in a rainbow of colors. The wall was lined with photos of garment tags (from non-AA clothing) each declaring that the item was made in China, Pakistan, Mexico…anywhere but the United States. There was a huge sign on the window that read, “Crafted with pride in Los Angeles, California.” I was immediately on the AA bandwagon. Well-paid laborers! A factory in downtown LA! How could this be bad?

When my bowling team bought t-shirts and silkscreened them, we went to American Apparel. My friend Russ used to work at one of their stores, so he could get us their clothing at pretty good prices (because it turns out I can’t afford the fruits of well-paid American labor). When I saw friends selling screenprinted shirts at Saturday Market or the awesome guy who sells (406) shirts at Missoula Farmer’s Market, I was happy to see they used AA shirts and sweatshirts.

But that was all before I found out the company was started by a chauvinist asshole, albeit an asshole with a great business plan that supported American industry and laborers. I did a few searches on the internet and found out that Dov Charney has had three sexual harassment claims brought against him by four female employees. He routinely walks around his office and factory wearing only underwear (that he designed, of course) and does a whole slew of things that I would definitely consider inappropriate – things that would offend me and make me uncomfortable. If I worked there, I would get a new job before anyone even learned how to pronounce my last name.

American Apparel’s ads have always been a little strange. They’re usually grainy (artsy?) photos of just one person against a white backdrop, and the person is wearing an article or two of AA clothing. Sort of. They’re usually in some state of undress when (one assumes) a photographer jumps out of nowhere to catch them on film. I was never particularly offended by these ads (I grew up with Abercrombie ads, I may never be shocked by suggestive nudity advertising clothing), but AA just came out with a few new internet ads that involve partial nudity. Like, of the important parts. As far as I know, the naked photos are all of women at this point.

Do I think people shouldn’t be allowed to advertise with half- or completely-naked models? I’m not sure. I know the photos of nude women I saw advertising lotions or porn hotlines in France (different ads in completely different places) made me uncomfortable, but that doesn’t necessarily mean they’re wrong. To be honest, the first thought I had was, This might not bother me so much if there were photos of naked men as well. Which was followed by, I don’t actually want to see photos of naked men, I would just feel less gross about the whole thing if it wasn’t gender specific.

So I’ve come to this very confusing place. If Dov Charney has done even half of the things I’ve read on the internet, I find him simultaneously fascinating, awesome, and disgusting. I don’t really know how to feel about buying clothing made by factory workers that work under good conditions, are paid well, and receive benefits, when the person who signs their checks (and takes my money) calls his female employees sluts and talks about sex all the time. Do I really have to ask myself whether I’d like to support child and slave labor or sexual harassment when I buy a t-shirt? And if so, how the hell do I answer that?



Filed under Deep Thoughts

6 responses to “Un-American

  1. Ugh. Sometimes ignorance *is* bliss. I had a similar dilemma when I was told by a bartender that the owner of one of the (very few) good midwest microbreweries is a total asshole. Dammit. But my situation was a bit easier to pass off as potentially untrue and simply ignore. Yay, willful ignorance.

    As for AA, I’ll probably still shop there, since I do so infrequently enough that I doubt I am impacting Charney’s fortune one way or the other.

    One strategy might be to only buy their stuff if you are buying it through someone else (like a Threadless T or your yellow one from Saturday Market). At least that way you know you are benefiting a business whose management you approve of as well. Think of it as a carbon offset for t-shirts.

  2. birdlegs

    You may have just ruined my week! Now I can’t plead ignorance though I may very well try. What if I just buy my Halloween costumes there? I would be using Bag O’ Sleeze’s clothes for a night of drunken debauchery. That seems appropriate.

  3. shawn

    i just spied your post and i understand your dilemma. i work here at the factory and can assure you that just about everything is ridiculous hyperbole. these are worth a look, if you get the chance.


    everyday, i come into work and it really is amazing. i’d love to talk to you about it more, but couldn’t seem to find your email. mine’s shawn [at] americanapparel [dot] net, if you so feel inclined.

  4. I submit the following short notes:
    1. LA continues to make the world a worse place.
    2. I’d rather have naked people in ads than the violence everyone seems OK with.
    3. Ignorance is NOT bliss. The whole quote is “Where ignorance is bliss, ’tis folly to be wise.” -Thomas Gray
    3a. Which, I think, means it sucks to be the smartest one in the room.
    4. @Shawn: Are those links supposed to help? The oppositions’ lawyer being as sketchy as Dov does not make Dov look any better.
    5. It’s the media. They’re sensationalistic to sell you advertising.
    6. It’s advertising, he’s sensationalistic to sell you an image.

  5. shawn

    @Alex The guy has a reputation as someone that uses the media to attack people he’s suing in order to earn easy settlements. He’s behind 4 of the 5 suits. The entire perception of Dov as a sexual harasser is a direct result of his actions. NY Knick Eddy Curry was just levied a sexual harassment lawsuit. Big story broke in the New York media and that will follow him forever. It’s almost an afterthought that the guy accusing him is a convicted felon. The lawyer taking up and pushing this image of the company as some ridiculous orgy having this kind of credibility is absolutely relevant to the conversation.

  6. mom

    right on alex! i love #2 – more sex and less violence would make the world a better place. however there is that fine line that “dov” crosses (putatively) using sex in violent or threatening/harassing ways that i can’t get behind.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s